Patty Hearst: Captive or Criminal

Patty Hearst: Captive or Criminal

How did Patty Hearst’s survival in captivity become a criminal choice?

Star

4.2 (22)

Headphones

166 mins

A high-profile kidnapping turns into a national terror case when the SLA transforms Patty Hearst into both hostage and accused accomplice. As the FBI manhunt and shocking robberies unfold, the story spirals into one of America’s most controversial story.

Ep 1:

A Brutal Abduction

A wealthy heiress is violently abducted from her Berkeley apartment, triggering a national panic when a radical group claims responsibility. The case quickly shifts from kidnapping to domestic terrorism.

Ep 2:

Patty Turns Tania

The FBI takes over and reveals a radical underground network led by Donald DeFreeze. When Patty Hearst appears in propaganda tapes and later during a bank robbery, the world is split- victim or willing accomplice?

See more

Discussions (5)

Neville

Level 6 · 3 mo ago

Idk why this is a debate. She clearly chose this.

Chester

Level 3 · 3 mo ago

Only a wealthy heiress could rob a bank on camera and still end up with a full presidential pardon.

Wesley

Level 10 · 3 mo ago

> running a media operation. Ironic since her grandfather William Randolph Hearst did exactly that. His famous quote: "You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war." They learned from the best, lol.

View all on Skoob